メインコンテンツにスキップ

混同行列計算機

二項分類器のTP/TN/FP/FNカウントから精度、適合率、再現率、F1、特異度、NPV、FPR、FNRおよびマシューズ相関係数を計算します。各メトリクスの公式と品質格付けが表示されます。

入力

正しく予測された正例。

モデルが見落とした実際の正例(陰性と予測)。

モデルが正と判定した実際の陰性例。

正しく予測された陰性例。

出力

Overall quality

Your results will appear here.

Confusion matrix
Predicted PositivePredicted Negative
No data yet
Metrics
MetricFormulaValueRating
No data yet
役に立ちましたか?

このツールを使う他の方法

REST API

curl -X POST https://api.iotools.cloud/v1/tool/confusion-matrix-calculator \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "truePositive": "50",
    "falseNegative": "10",
    "falsePositive": "5",
    "trueNegative": "100"
  }'

ご自身のアカウントのキーに差し替えてください。ツールのフィールドがそのままリクエストボディになります——ラッパーはありません。

AIエージェントに依頼する

Use the IOTools `confusion-matrix-calculator` tool (Confusion Matrix Calculator) on this input:

YOUR_INPUT_HERE

IOTools MCPサーバーに接続された任意のエージェントにこれを貼り付け、入力内容を追加してください。

埋め込みウィジェット

<iframe
  src="https://iotools.cloud/embed/confusion-matrix-calculator/"
  width="100%" height="520" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" loading="lazy"
  title="混同行列計算機 — iotools.cloud"
  sandbox="allow-scripts allow-forms allow-same-origin allow-downloads allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"
  allow="clipboard-write"
  style="width:100%;border:1px solid #e5e7eb;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden"></iframe>
<script src="https://iotools.cloud/embed.js" async></script>

ご自身のページに貼り付けるだけ——無料、キー不要、リンクを掲載するだけです。

API/MCP 1回あたりの費用5クレジットから
クレジットが足りませんか?料金を見る

次の方法でも利用可能

ガイド

What does this calculator do?

Enter the four counts from a binary classifier's confusion matrix — True Positive, False Negative, False Positive, and True Negative — and get every standard evaluation metric computed instantly: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, Specificity, F1 Score, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), Negative Predictive Value, False Positive Rate, False Negative Rate, and a Balanced Accuracy estimate. Each metric shows its formula and a quality rating (Excellent / Good / Fair / Poor), so you don't have to remember which formula is which or re-derive them by hand.

How to use it

  1. Enter True Positive (TP) — cases correctly predicted positive.
  2. Enter False Negative (FN) — actual positives the model missed.
  3. Enter False Positive (FP) — actual negatives the model flagged as positive.
  4. Enter True Negative (TN) — cases correctly predicted negative.
  5. Read the results: an overall quality gauge, the matrix laid out as a table, and every metric with its formula and rating.

Why use MCC instead of just Accuracy?

Accuracy can be misleading on imbalanced datasets — a classifier that always predicts "negative" on a dataset that's 99% negative scores 99% accuracy while catching zero positives. Matthews Correlation Coefficient uses all four confusion-matrix counts in one balanced measure, ranging from -1 (total disagreement) to +1 (perfect prediction), with 0 meaning no better than random guessing — which is why it's considered the more reliable single number for imbalanced classes.

What's the difference between Precision and Recall?

Precision answers "of everything I predicted positive, how much was actually positive?" (TP / (TP+FP)) — it penalizes false alarms. Recall (Sensitivity) answers "of everything that was actually positive, how much did I catch?" (TP / (TP+FN)) — it penalizes misses. The two trade off against each other, which is why F1 Score (their harmonic mean) is often reported as a single balance point between them.

Is the "AUC estimate" a real AUC?

Not exactly — a true ROC AUC needs classifier scores across many decision thresholds, which a single confusion matrix (one threshold) can't provide. The "AUC estimate" shown here is Balanced Accuracy — the average of Recall and Specificity — a common single-threshold approximation, not a substitute for computing a real ROC curve if you have per-sample scores.

Privacy

All calculations run locally in your browser — your counts are never sent to a server.

For evaluating whether a difference between two rates is statistically significant (e.g. comparing two models' conversion or error rates), see the A/B Test Significance Calculator. To plan how much data you'd need to detect a given effect size before collecting it, see the A/B Test Sample Size Calculator.

precisionrecallsensitivityspecificityf1 scorematthews correlation coefficientmcctrue positive ratefalse positive rateclassification metricsmodel evaluationmachine learning

ツールが気に入りましたか?広告をなくしましょう。

1回のお支払いでアカウントから広告が完全になくなります。サブスクリプションも追跡もありません。